Leveraging Common Code Libraries in ETL Projects
Executive Summary
ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) initiatives are foundational to data-driven organisations, yet they are often slowed by duplicated logic, inconsistent transformations, and fragmented standards across pipelines. By establishing a clear framework and methodology within the technology layer, organisations can standardise integration practices and reduce unnecessary variation. This enables the development of a shared library of common ETL components—spanning ingestion, transformation, validation, logging, and error handling—which in turn improves delivery speed, data quality, and long-term maintainability.
The Importance of a Common Integration Architecture
Faster Delivery and Lower Cost
Integration projects repeatedly solve the same problems within the ETL space: schema validation, deduplication, enrichment, auditing, and retries. A common code library allows teams to reuse proven components instead of rebuilding them for every pipeline. In collections platforms, this commonly includes reusable logic for account status normalisation, strategy decisioning, and enrichment of payment and promise data across multiple source systems.
Executive impact:
- Reduced development and onboarding time
- Lower implementation and support costs
- Faster time-to-data for downstream analytics
Improved Data Quality and Consistency
Uniform standard of working allows re-use of components through shared transformation and validation logic ensures that core business rules are applied uniformly across data pipelines. Fixes or enhancements in one place immediately improve all dependent workflows.
For example, shared transformation logic for account status and delinquency stage ensures that the same definitions are applied consistently across collections dashboards, strategy engines, and downstream reporting. Similarly, standardised enrichment of payment events and promises-to-pay reduces discrepancies between operational systems and regulatory or management reporting.
Executive impact:
- Fewer data discrepancies across systems
- Higher trust in reporting and analytics
- Reduced operational and reconciliation effort
Reduced Operational Risk
In collections environments, common handling of agency files, regulatory audit fields, and exception logging is particularly valuable. These components are exercised repeatedly across placements, recalls, and compliance reporting, making them more resilient and easier to evidence during audits.
Executive impact:
- Fewer production failures
- Faster root-cause analysis
- More predictable operations at scale
The Risk of Overloading Common ETL Code
While shared libraries create leverage, they can become a liability if every project-specific requirement is forced into them. In ETL environments, this risk often surfaces as bloated transformation logic, excessive configuration, or fragile dependencies.
Executive Decision Framework
Before approving a change to shared ETL code, leaders should ask:
- Will multiple pipelines realistically benefit from this within the next year?
- Does this simplify or complicate the shared ETL framework?
- Will this change increase the blast radius of failures?
- Is there a clear owner accountable for its ongoing health?
If the answers point toward complexity, instability, or narrow value, separate pipeline-specific code is the better business decision.
Five Guidelines for Conformance vs. Independence
Executives should expect teams to keep changes out of common code when the following conditions apply:
- Pipeline-Specific Business Logic
If a transformation reflects unique business rules for a single source, consumer, or dataset—such as strategy-specific tagging or bespoke agency reporting—it should remain within that pipeline.
- Breaking or Destabilising Existing Pipelines
Changes that require broad rewrites of existing pipelines, schema contracts, or downstream expectations increase operational risk.
- Excessive Conditional Logic
If supporting a new requirement requires numerous flags, branching logic, or configuration options, the shared code is likely being stretched beyond its purpose.
Rule of thumb:
When common ETL code becomes harder to understand than duplicating it, it has gone too far.
- Rapidly Changing or Experimental Requirements
ETL pipelines supporting pilots, evolving data sources, or temporary integrations—such as new collections strategies or short-term regulatory requests—should not drive changes to stable shared libraries
- Unclear Ownership
Common ETL code requires strong ownership. If no platform or data engineering team can commit to maintaining the change long-term, it should stay local to the project.
Conclusion
A common code library is a strategic asset for ETL programs, enabling faster delivery, higher data quality, and reduced operational risk. However, its value depends on disciplined scope control. In collections platforms where regulatory scrutiny, operational scale, and rapid strategy change coexist this discipline is especially critical. Treating conformance as a deliberate decision allows organisations to scale shared ETL capabilities without sacrificing agility, ownership, or compliance.
Find out how our analytics team can help with your vulnerable customer strategy
Find out about our training courses
Sign up to our newsletter for more insights
Contact me directly
Request a callback from one of our experts
About the author
With nearly a decade of experience in the collections and recoveries sector, Chris specialises in designing and delivering high-impact ETL and Debt manager config solutions that power data-driven operations. As an ETL Developer approaching his 10-year milestone this October, He has led and supported multiple large-scale migration and upgrade initiatives, including complex state-to-state, data migrations and Debt Manager system implementations.
Christopher Irving
Lead Consutant