Digital and AI
Making Agile work in collections software implementations
Hasib Ahmed, Principal Consultant · · 4 minute read
Implementing a new collections platform, whether PCC, Debt Manager, EFS, CACS X or another, is a major undertaking. It is usually driven by better functionality, regulatory alignment or operational efficiency.
Principal Consultant, arum
What you need to know
- Agile delivers early wins in collections implementations, but only with real discipline.
- Hybrid can work. Waterfall wearing an Agile badge does not, and the misfires are visible in delivery.
- The methodology choice shapes the outcome as much as the platform choice does.
As a consultant, I've seen firsthand how the choice of implementation methodology (Agile vs. a Waterfall hybrid approach) can make or break the success of these projects.
In this blog, I want to take a look at the Agile methodology specifically: the good, the bad, and the lessons I've learned using it for software transitions.
Agile can deliver early wins
Agile implementations offer a dynamic and iterative approach to software delivery. When applied correctly, they allow organisations to break down large, complex transitions into manageable increments, delivering value early and often.
Agile also encourages continuous feedback, which is critical when migrating from legacy systems with deeply embedded processes.
Example: PCC implementation using Agile
One organisation chose to implement PCC using Agile, starting with a pilot focused on early arrears. By delivering functionality in sprints, they were able to test integrations, validate user journeys, and refine workflows before scaling. This approach not only reduced risk but also built confidence across the business. Stakeholders saw tangible progress every few weeks, and the final rollout was smoother, faster, and better aligned to user needs.
Make sure you're not using Waterfall in disguise
Agile isn't a shortcut; it requires discipline, collaboration, and a genuine shift in mindset. I've seen projects where Agile was adopted in name only, with teams still operating in a Waterfall fashion. Requirements were locked up front, change was resisted, and feedback loops were ignored. The result? Delays, rework, and a solution that didn't meet business needs.
Example: Debt Manager implementation with a hybrid misfire
A financial institution attempted a hybrid Agile-Waterfall approach for their Debt Manager implementation. While delivery teams worked in sprints, governance and decision-making remained rigid and top-down. This misalignment led to bottlenecks, scope creep, and a lack of ownership. The hybrid model, without clear boundaries and shared understanding, created confusion and diluted the benefits of both methodologies.
Hybrid could offer the best of both worlds
While Agile offers speed and flexibility, and Waterfall provides structure and control, many organisations find that a hybrid approach delivers the best outcomes especially in regulated environments like collections and recoveries.
Example: Hybrid implementation of PCC
A client transitioning from a legacy system to PCC used Waterfall for initial planning, compliance mapping, and data migration. Once the foundation was set, Agile sprints were used to configure workflows, test integrations, and refine user journeys. This balance allowed for both control and adaptability resulting in a successful go-live with minimal disruption.
The best methodology is the one that fits your organisation's culture, regulatory obligations, and delivery goals. Hybrid isn't a compromise; it's a strategic choice.
How to get Agile right
From these experiences, several key lessons and best practices emerged:
- Define your Agile model clearly: Whether it's Scrum, Kanban, or a hybrid, clarity on roles, ceremonies, and governance is essential. Avoid mixing models without a shared understanding.
- Engage stakeholders early and often: Agile thrives on collaboration. Involve business users, compliance teams, and IT from day one to ensure alignment and buy-in.
- Focus on MVP and iterative delivery: Don't aim to deliver everything at once. Prioritise high-impact features and build incrementally, validating along the way.
- Invest in Agile coaching and change management: Agile is a cultural shift. Support teams with coaching, training, and clear communication to embed new ways of working.
- Use Agile to de-risk complex transitions: Agile allows for early testing of integrations, data migrations, and regulatory requirements reducing surprises at go-live.
- Measure outcomes, not just velocity: Success isn't about how many stories are completed it's about improved collections performance, reduced complaints, and better customer outcomes.
Final thoughts
Agile implementations in collections and recoveries can be transformative but only when approached with clarity, commitment, and collaboration. Whether you're transitioning to PCC, upgrading to Debt Manager, or implementing EFS, CACS X or another product, the methodology you choose will shape your success.
At arum, we've led Agile and hybrid implementations across multiple platforms and clients. We understand the nuances, the pitfalls, and the opportunities. If you're planning a system transition and want to explore how Agile or hybrid delivery can work for you, take a look at our helpful resources below or contact us directly to discuss your needs.
From the same author
More from Hasib Ahmed.
Macro economicsWhy the autumn budget demands action from collections leaders
The Autumn Budget has landed and for millions already struggling, the message is clear: the vulnerable just became more vulnerable.
Hasib Ahmed · 26 November 2025
Digital and AISprint to success: 7 ways to master sprint planning in collections
In the fast-paced technology space, effective sprint planning is crucial for the success of collections and recoveries projects.
Hasib Ahmed · 15 August 2025
Regulatory changeWhat the new Product Sales Data regulation means for lenders
As the financial services landscape continues to evolve, regulatory compliance remains a moving target.
Hasib Ahmed · 25 June 2025
Keep reading
More from arum.
Digital and AIWhat three weeks at MIT taught us about building agentic AI
Ella and Matt took MIT's agentic AI course to pressure-test the AI-assisted system arum was already building. Here is what held up and what did not.
Matt Riddall and Ella Grice · 17 June 2026
Digital and AIBuy vs. build for debt collection platforms
In today's economic and regulatory environment, transforming collections capability is high on organisations' strategic imperatives.
Reuben Gates · 13 May 2026
Digital and AIIs your AI agent actually ready? 11 questions to ask first
Eleven questions to answer before an AI agent handles a customer in arrears, from a team that has been building them since 2019.
Matt Riddall · 2 April 2026
Talk to arum
