Digital and AI
Collections systems in Australia and New Zealand: upgrade or replace?
Matt Riddall, SVP, Marketplace, Data and AI · · 4 minute read
AU
In Australia and New Zealand (ANZ), many organisations are actively reassessing their collections and recoveries technology, often faced with a familiar choice: upgrade the incumbent system or take the opportunity to implement something new.
Matt RiddallSVP, Marketplace, Data and AI, arum
What you need to know
- Replacing a collections system takes a similar timeline to upgrading one, which surprises most teams.
- Contract renewal is the moment with the most leverage, and it is usually spent on price alone.
- There is no single right answer. An enhanced incumbent is the right call for some organisations.
Sticking with a long-standing platform can feel like the lower-risk route, especially where there's a history of use and internal knowledge. However, replacing a collections system is no longer the daunting task it once was. In many cases, implementing a new solution can be just as efficient as an upgrade, and may open up much greater value in the long run.
In this blog, I'll take you through what you should bear in mind when making this important decision.
Keep an open view of the market
There's a strong tradition in the region of maintaining trusted partnerships with established technology providers, including platforms such as Experian's Tallyman and PowerCurve Collections (PCC). These systems are widely used and well understood across financial services and utilities.
However, with cloud-native architecture now the norm, and integration capabilities advancing rapidly, the range of options available to ANZ organisations has expanded significantly. Cloud infrastructure from providers like AWS and Azure supports a more agile technology environment, enabling even established institutions to challenge legacy thinking and consider global innovations with local application.
Organisations that broaden their market scan rather than defaulting to the known often uncover smarter ways to meet evolving business and regulatory needs.
Implementation vs upgrade: similar timelines
One of the most common myths is that switching to a new system is far more complex and time-consuming than an upgrade. Yet, timeframes for both approaches are often comparable:
- Major system upgrades (for example, moving from older to newer versions of incumbent platforms) typically take 9 to 18 months, depending on the level of configuration and testing required.
- Full system replacements, including data migration and user training, usually fall within a similar delivery window, particularly where a structured approach is taken to data readiness and phased rollouts.
- In either scenario, a well-managed programme enables organisations to build in best practices and strengthen the foundations for automation, AI, and customer-centric engagement.
New platforms, new possibilities
Choosing a new collections system opens the door to broader strategic gains. These include:
- Stronger integration capabilities, including API-first architecture and real-time event streaming, making it easier to connect with CRMs, analytics platforms, and payment solutions.
- Advanced features such as GenAI-enabled strategy design, predictive segmentation, and automated customer journeys.
- Futureproofing through scalable, cloud-based models that support fast policy or regulatory changes (something particularly important across Australia's and New Zealand's evolving compliance landscape).
- While upgrades to existing platforms can also unlock some of these capabilities, there's often more flexibility and pace available through a new build approach, especially when internal limitations or legacy customisations have built up over time.
Use contract renewal as a strategic lever
Many ANZ organisations are approaching renewal points with their current technology providers. These moments present a valuable opportunity to:
- benchmark the market both locally and globally,
- reassess the organisation's long-term technology and customer strategies,
- ensure commercial and contractual terms reflect current expectations, and
- validate that the chosen platform continues to align with operational goals.
- Even where the incumbent system is likely to remain, this process ensures any gaps or weaknesses are addressed, and that the business is not missing out on capabilities available elsewhere.
Making an informed choice
There's no one-size-fits-all answer. For some, staying with an enhanced version of a familiar platform like PCC or Tallyman may be the right fit. For others, the opportunity to implement a new system aligned to today's data, customer, and digital ambitions could prove transformative.
The most important factor is taking a structured, open, and forward-looking approach, not just defaulting to historical relationships.
Supporting your next step
arum has worked extensively across the ANZ region with organisations using a variety of collections systems including deep experience with Tallyman and PowerCurve Collections (PCC), as well as newer entrants to the market.
We understand the realities of delivering change in regulated, customer-centric environments and the trade-offs involved in upgrade vs replacement decisions.
If you're starting to explore options or approaching a decision point, take a look at our helpful resources below or contact us directly to discuss your needs.
From the same author
More from Matt Riddall.
Digital and AIStill running Experian Tallyman? How to optimize it and plan what comes next
Still running Experian Tallyman? How long the estate should stay, what is worth improving now, and how to plan the move to PowerCurve Collections or the wider market.
Matt Riddall · 29 October 2026
Digital and AIHow to choose a collections and recoveries system in 2026
Choosing a collections and recoveries system means setting requirements first, mapping the whole market against them, shortlisting on evidence, testing the shortlist with scripted scenario demonstrations, and negotiating the contract before implementation starts.
Matt Riddall · 22 October 2026
Digital and AIWhat three weeks at MIT taught us about building agentic AI
Ella and Matt took MIT's agentic AI course to pressure-test the AI-assisted system arum was already building. Here is what held up and what did not.
Matt Riddall and Ella Grice · 17 June 2026
Keep reading
More from arum.
Digital and AIRunning Debt Manager? Versions, upgrade paths and what a migration involves
Which path to take with an existing Debt Manager estate: optimize the current release, upgrade, or move to C&R's SaaS. What a migration involves and what to fix first. By Forid Meah, arum.
Forid Meah · 5 November 2026
Digital and AIBuy vs. build for debt collection platforms
In today's economic and regulatory environment, transforming collections capability is high on organisations' strategic imperatives.
Reuben Gates · 13 May 2026
Digital and AIIs your AI agent actually ready? 11 questions to ask first
Eleven questions to answer before an AI agent handles a customer in arrears, from a team that has been building them since 2019.
Matt Riddall · 2 April 2026
Talk to arum
